| Subaru EJ Series
Engine Compression Ratio Calculations 
This is a brief CR FAQ
regarding the EJ series engines used on various Subarus
sold into the North American market. I will start with
engines that I have personal experience with, and may be
expanded to other EJ series motors as information becomes
available.
Q: What are the
differences between the 2.2L and 2.5L engines?
A: This is definitely a frequently-asked
question. One of the best places to start with answers is
the NASIOC FAQ's.
Here is a summary of
commonly-debated numbers in the NASIOC forums:
| Model
Years |
Engine |
Applications |
Displacement
(cc) |
Published/Estimated
Compression Ratio |
| 1990-1996 |
2.2L
SOHC |
Legacy,
Impreza |
2212 |
9.5:1 |
| 1991-1994 |
2.2L
SOHC Turbo |
Legacy
Turbo |
2212 |
8.0:1 |
| 1993-1996 |
1.8L
SOHC |
Impreza |
1820 |
9.5:1 |
| 1997-1998 |
2.2L
SOHC |
Legacy,
Impreza |
2212 |
9.7:1 |
| 1998 |
2.5L
DOHC |
Legacy,
Impreza |
2457 |
9.7:1 |
| 1999 |
2.5L
SOHC |
Legacy,
Impreza, Forester |
2457 |
Range
from 9.7:1 to 10.0:1 |
| 2000-2004 |
2.5L
SOHC |
Legacy,
Impreza, Forester |
2457 |
10.0:1 |
| 2002-2004 |
2.0L
DOHC Turbo |
Legacy,
Impreza, Forester |
1994 |
8.0:1 |
Q: Didn't Subaru
redesign the engine over the years and change compression
ratios?
A: First, see the answers to the previous
question. Most current information available is from
numbers published by Subaru, or from heresay. It is the
latter that has prompted me to take measurements to
confirm the numbers.
Q: What are the
piston and cylinder volumes? Has anyone cc'd these
engines?
A: The NASIOC archives (look for the "search"
link) are usually a good place to find this type of
information, but I have not been successful from
searching the archives. There are plenty of questions,
but not many answers. I'm certain that some tuning shops
have this information, but I have not seen their data.
This table summarizes some
measurements and calculations for stock configurations:
| Engine Block |
Cylinder
Head |
Bore¹
(cm) |
Stroke¹
(cm) |
Displ
(cc) |
Gasket
bore¹ (cm) |
Gasket
Thickness (cm) |
Quench
Vol (cc) |
Head
Vol (cc) |
Piston
Vol (cc) |
Calc'd
CR |
Notes |
| MY90
EJ22 |
MY90 EJ22 |
9.69 |
7.5 |
553 |
9.69 |
0.152 |
11.2 |
40* |
14.5¤ |
9.4:1 |
EJ22 9.5:1 stock |
| MY91
EJ22T |
MY91 EJ22T |
9.69 |
7.5 |
553 |
9.69 |
0.152 |
11.2 |
40* |
28²¤ |
8.0:1 |
EJ22T 8.0:1 stock |
| MY95
EJ18 |
MY95 EJ18 |
8.79 |
7.5 |
455 |
8.79 |
0.152 |
9.2 |
TBD |
14 |
TBD |
EJ18 9.5:1 stock |
| MY97
EJ22 |
MY97 EJ22 |
9.69 |
7.5 |
553 |
9.69 |
0.152 |
11.2 |
41² |
12² |
9.6:1 |
EJ22 9.7:1 stock |
| MY98
EJ25 |
MY98 EJ25 |
9.96 |
7.9 |
616 |
9.96 |
0.152 |
11.8 |
46³ |
14² |
9.6:1 |
EJ25 DOHC 9.7:1
stock |
| MY98
EJ25 |
MY98 EJ25 |
9.96 |
7.9 |
616 |
9.96 |
0.152 |
11.8 |
46³ |
15§ |
9.4:1 |
EJ25 DOHC stock 2§ |
| MY99
EJ25 |
MY99 EJ25 |
9.96 |
7.9 |
616 |
9.96 |
0.058 |
4.5 |
TBD |
15§ |
TBD |
EJ25 SOHC 10.0:1
stock |
| MY00
EJ25 |
MY00 EJ25 |
9.96 |
7.9 |
616 |
9.96 |
0.058 |
4.5 |
50² |
6² |
11.2:1 |
EJ25 SOHC 10.0:1
stock |
| MY02
EJ20T |
MY02 EJ20T |
9.20 |
7.5 |
499 |
9.20 |
0.08 |
5.3 |
49ß |
TBD |
TBD |
EJ20T 8.0:1 stock |
This table summarizes some
measurements and calculations for several custom
configurations:
| Engine Block |
Cylinder
Head |
Bore¹
(cm) |
Stroke¹
(cm) |
Displ
(cc) |
Gasket
bore¹ (cm) |
Gasket
Thickness (cm) |
Quench
Vol (cc) |
Head
Vol (cc) |
Piston
Vol (cc) |
Calc'd
CR |
Notes |
| MY98
EJ25 |
MY98 EJ25 |
9.96 |
7.9 |
616 |
9.96 |
0.058 |
4.5 |
46³ |
14* |
10.5:1 |
Thin SOHC head
gasket |
| MY91
EJ22T |
MY98 EJ25 |
9.69 |
7.5 |
553 |
9.96 |
0.152 |
11.8 |
46³ |
28²¤ |
7.4:1 |
EJ22T/DOHC hybrid |
| MY91 EJ22T |
MY98 EJ25 |
9.69 |
7.5 |
553 |
9.96 |
0.058 |
4.5 |
46³ |
28²¤ |
8.0:1 |
Thin
SOHC head gasket |
| MY00
EJ25 |
MY00 EJ25 |
9.96 |
7.9 |
616 |
9.96 |
0.152 |
11.8 |
50² |
6² |
10.1:1 |
Thick DOHC head
gasket |
| MY91 EJ22T |
MY00/01 EJ25 |
9.69 |
7.5 |
553 |
9.96 |
0.058 |
4.5 |
50² |
28²¤ |
7.7:1 |
EJ22T/SOHC
hybrid |
| MY91
EJ22T |
MY00 EJ25 |
9.69 |
7.5 |
553 |
9.69 |
0.150 |
11.2 |
50² |
28²¤ |
7.2:1 |
Thick DOHC head
gasket |
| MY91 EJ22T |
MY97 EJ22 |
9.69 |
7.5 |
553 |
9.96 |
0.058 |
4.5 |
41² |
28²¤ |
8.5:1 |
Thin
SOHC head gasket |
¹ From published data.
² From actual measurement. Measurement errors are
estimated to be ±0.25cc using a 10cc capacity graduated
medical syringe, Pennzoil 10W40 motor oil, and visually
sighting the meniscus. Ambient temperature was about
10°C.
³ From Andrew (mcgyver) at NASIOC.
¤ From http://www.sdsefi.com. Notable pages are http://www.sdsefi.com/air17.html and http://www.sdsefi.com/air21.html.
§ From Larry (ImprezaRS dot com) at NASIOC.
ß From Cobb Tuning at NASIOC.
* Estimated from published CR data.
Note that both EJ22 and EJ25
pistons are flush with the deck at TDC, therefore I have
assumed that quench volume is determined solely by head
gasket thickness. I have done some "what-if"
scenarios to see how much of an effect a thicker or
thinner head gasket has on the compression ratio to an
otherwise stock engine.
I'm not pretending that this
is performed using rigorous experimental procedures, but
accuracy should be enough to provide ballpark numbers
within two significant figures.

What do we learn here?
- My 1997 EJ22
measurements and calculations are very close to
the official number of 9.7:1 CR, and are
certainly well within measurement errors.
- The offical word from
Subaru on the MY00's compression ratio is 10.0:1.
This is somewhat less than measured, so maybe the
official number is an "effective compression
ratio" as a result of intake valve overlap?
- Changing head gasket
thickness has a significant effect on compression
ratio.
- Yellow entry above is a
popular hybrid using an EJ22T block with DOHC
heads from a MY98 EJ25 2.5RS or MY97-99 2.5GT or
Legacy Outback. Note that the use of a thin SOHC
head gasket provides a more favourable
compression ratio than the original thick DOHC
head gasket.
- Cyan entry above is
another popular hybrid using an EJ22T block with
SOHC heads from a newer EJ25. This has been
reported to be a highly reliable combination due
to a low compression ratio and good-flowing
heads.

Last
updated: 3 May 2003.
|